Tracking Public Interest Through Google Trends: Comparative Analysis of Global Movements

Penulis

  • Amila Nanayakkara Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka
  • B.T.G.S.Kumara Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka
  • R.M.K.T.Rathnayaka Sabaragamuwa University of Sri Lanka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56427/jcbd.v3i3.597

Kata Kunci:

Google Trend Analysis, South African (SA) Unrest 2021, Black Lives Matter Movement (BLMM) 2020, Masha Amini Protest (Iran protest) 2022

Abstrak

This paper examined the digital dynamics of three significant social justice movements: Black Lives Matter (2020), South African unrest (2021), and Mahsa Amini protests (2022) through the lens of Google Trends analysis. By tracking search interest patterns during key events, the study explored how each movement gained momentum and sustained visibility online. The analysis revealed distinct public engagement patterns for each movement: The Black Lives Matter movement experienced global peaks in search interest, with sustained attention driven by discussions on police reform and racial justice. The South African unrest saw sharp, localized spikes in search activity, particularly during moments of heightened tension such as the looting incidents and the government’s deployment of the military. The Mahsa Amini protests demonstrated sustained, high-level interest globally, with search trends reflecting the growing international focus on human rights and state repression in Iran. The findings highlighted how search engines like Google played a pivotal role in amplifying these movements, documenting societal reactions, and shaping the global public discourse. This study underscored the power of digital platforms to reflect and influence the trajectory of social movements across different political and cultural contexts.

Unduhan

Data unduhan belum tersedia.

Referensi

J. Earl, T. V. Maher, and J. Pan, "The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review," Science Advances, vol. 8, no. 10, article eabl8198, 2022.

R. R. Mourao and D. K. Brown, "Black Lives Matter coverage: How protest news frames and attitudinal change affect social media engagement," Digital Journalism, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 626-646, 2022.

N. Phungula, "Understanding the dynamics of South Africa’s July 2021 social unrest," Journal of Nation-building & Policy Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 71-87, 2024.

F. Mubarak, "Riots or revolution? A framing analysis of the Mahsa Amini protests in US and Iranian media," Media Asia, pp. 1-25, 2024.

N. Alperstein, Performing Media Activism in the Digital Age. Springer Nature, 2021.

M. G. Chon and H. Park, "Social media activism in the digital age: Testing an integrative model of activism on contentious issues," Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 72-97, 2020.

L. G. Smith, L. Piwek, J. Hinds, O. Brown, and A. Joinson, "Digital traces of offline mobilization," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 496, 2023.

L. K. Jones, "# BlackLivesMatter: An analysis of the movement as social drama," Humanity & Society, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 92-110, 2020.

K. Kretschmer, R. Njuguna, and A. Budree, "Social Media Activism in South Africa," in International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, July 2023, pp. 223-233.

C. Klein, R. Reimann, I. O. Quintana, M. Cheong, M. Ferreira, and M. Alfano, "Attention and counter-framing in the Black Lives Matter movement on Twitter," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1-12, 2022.

Diterbitkan

2024-09-30

Cara Mengutip

Nanayakkara, A., B.T.G.S.Kumara, & R.M.K.T.Rathnayaka. (2024). Tracking Public Interest Through Google Trends: Comparative Analysis of Global Movements. Journal of Computers and Digital Business, 3(3), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.56427/jcbd.v3i3.597

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles